makes one long for the good 'ol pre-digital days of optics! Not like there's no deception in optics...
thanks for the reading. I'm interested in canadiana and anyone who can bring some critical perspective to art that can be perceived as "nice", i.e. Pam Hall & Margaret Dragu's durational, conversation/exchange, Felicity Tayler's painting perf., talking up folk in the streets as well as her interest in unearthing local, micro- histories, as opposed to a practice such as Sophie Calle's that, under the guise of personal narrative, locates the work on a wider, more objective plane. Why is Sophie Calle's work not "nice" in a folkloric way ?
Jake, i'm not really looking for an answer unless this touches on something you can easily put your finger on.
Joignez-nous sur Facebook!
canadiana 101
makes one long for the good 'ol pre-digital days of optics! Not like there's no deception in optics...
thanks for the reading. I'm interested in canadiana and anyone who can bring some critical perspective to art that can be perceived as "nice", i.e. Pam Hall & Margaret Dragu's durational, conversation/exchange, Felicity Tayler's painting perf., talking up folk in the streets as well as her interest in unearthing local, micro- histories, as opposed to a practice such as Sophie Calle's that, under the guise of personal narrative, locates the work on a wider, more objective plane. Why is Sophie Calle's work not "nice" in a folkloric way ?
Jake, i'm not really looking for an answer unless this touches on something you can easily put your finger on.
Anne